Aging infrastructure in the U.S. is a growing issue, with over $1 trillion in repair backlogs and severe consequences for the economy, safety, and environment. Water main breaks occur every 2 minutes, wasting 6 million gallons of treated water daily. If unaddressed, outdated infrastructure could cost the U.S. $7 trillion in lost business sales and $4 trillion in GDP losses by 2025. Climate change further worsens the problem, causing more frequent failures and higher maintenance costs.

Key Challenges:

  • Rising Costs: Deferred maintenance grows by 7% annually, costing households an extra $3,300 per year.
  • Frequent Failures: 240,000 water main breaks and 1 in 9 bridges classified as deficient.
  • Compliance Issues: Older systems struggle to meet modern safety, environmental, and capacity standards.

Solutions:

Oxand Simeo™ offers predictive maintenance tools to reduce costs, prevent failures, and improve efficiency:

  • 10–20% savings on maintenance budgets.
  • Up to 60% reduction in energy consumption.
  • 20–40% longer asset lifespans with fewer breakdowns.
Traditional Maintenance Predictive Maintenance (Oxand) Reactive and costly repairs Forecast-based, cost-efficient fixes Frequent breakdowns 70% fewer failures Higher energy use 60% energy savings

Main Problems with Aging Infrastructure

Aging infrastructure in the U.S. creates both operational headaches and financial burdens. Tackling these issues demands a shift toward predictive maintenance strategies.

Higher Maintenance Costs

As infrastructure ages, maintenance costs continue to climb.

Here’s how it impacts finances:

  • Deferred maintenance expenses rise by 7% annually [5].
  • American households spend an extra $3,300 per year due to infrastructure-related problems [5].
  • Poor road conditions add $0.50–$1.00 per gallon in vehicle repair costs for drivers [3].

For example, in Mobile, Alabama, Mayor Sandy Stimpson inherited a $250 million deferred maintenance backlog in 2013 [4]. These costs often snowball when severe equipment failures occur.

Equipment Failure Risks

Aging systems are more prone to breakdowns, which lead to more than just repair bills:

  • Over 80% of U.S. buildings were built before 2000 and require frequent repairs [5].
  • Nearly 240,000 water main breaks happen annually across the country’s 1.2 million miles of pipes [1].
  • About 1 in 9 bridges is classified as structurally deficient [1].

Take the 2018 Camp Fire in California as a stark reminder. This tragic wildfire, the deadliest in the state’s history, was caused by outdated electrical infrastructure [5]. Such disasters highlight the urgent need for modern safety measures.

Meeting Current Standards

As infrastructure ages, keeping up with modern regulations becomes increasingly difficult. Older systems often fall short in areas like:

Compliance Area Key Challenges Environmental Standards Struggles to meet stricter wastewater and stormwater regulations [6]. Safety Regulations Many older buildings fail to comply with today’s building codes [7]. Capacity Requirements Legacy systems can’t handle growing population demands [6]. Monitoring Systems Outdated equipment lacks advanced safety monitoring technology [8].

The scope of the problem is massive – an estimated $150 billion investment is needed over the next 20 years just to bring U.S. infrastructure up to current standards [6].

Oxand‘s Lifecycle Management System

Oxand

Oxand Simeo™: How It Works

Managing aging infrastructure demands a solid, data-based approach. Oxand Simeo™ uses a model-driven system that relies on historical data rather than just real-time IoT inputs. It incorporates over 10,000 predictive models and 30,000 maintenance rules, built on decades of expertise [2].

One example is its application for the French Ministry of the Armed Forces. The software analyzed 31 million ft² of built surfaces, 2 billion ft² of unbuilt surfaces, and more than 80,000 structures, with a total value exceeding $16.3 billion [9]. This helped determine the best strategies for investments and asset disposal.

Cutting Costs and Boosting Energy Efficiency

Oxand’s predictive maintenance approach helps reduce expenses while improving asset performance:

Area Improvement Maintenance Costs 10–15% savings through risk-based optimization Component Lifecycle Up to 25% cost reduction for specific components Overall Savings Potential savings of up to 30% Energy Efficiency Boosted through targeted upgrades

These results stem from automated decision-making and data-driven investment strategies. The focus is on balancing cost savings with performance improvements, while also maintaining strong risk management and meeting compliance requirements [2].

Risk Management and Compliance

Beyond cost and performance benefits, Oxand Simeo™ ensures assets meet evolving compliance standards. The system is designed to align with ISO 55001, introduced in 2014, through two main capabilities:

  • Compliance & Monitoring: Monitors asset conditions, flags risks, and ensures adherence to current standards while preparing for future regulations [10].
  • Strategic Planning: Creates long-term investment plans based on detailed asset evaluations and risk assessments [10].
sbb-itb-5be7949

Old vs. New Maintenance Methods

Reactive maintenance often leads to higher risks and expenses. According to a McKinsey report, predictive maintenance could help organizations save up to $630 billion in unnecessary costs by 2025 [12]. Let’s break down the differences between traditional reactive methods and modern predictive approaches.

Comparing Maintenance Methods

Aspect Traditional Reactive Approach Predictive Approach (e.g., Oxand) Maintenance Timing After a failure occurs Based on forecasts and predictions Downtime Impact Accounts for 45.7% of total maintenance time [13] Reduces downtime by 35–50% [11] Asset Lifespan Shortened due to frequent emergency repairs Increases by 20–40% [11] Cost Structure Low initial investment, but high emergency repair expenses Higher upfront costs but 25% lower overall maintenance expenses [15] Worker Productivity Decreased due to unplanned emergencies Improves by 10–15% [14] Equipment Reliability Prone to frequent unexpected failures Reduces breakdowns by up to 70% [15]

This comparison highlights how predictive maintenance can improve both operational efficiency and financial outcomes.

For example, in the energy sector, a predictive system accurately forecasted compressor downtime with 80% precision, providing a 30-minute warning and generating over $1 million in production gains per site [14]. Similarly, Swedish utility Jämtkraft adopted ABB’s MNS Digital solution for predictive maintenance, enabling real-time monitoring, extending equipment lifespans, and streamlining maintenance schedules [15].

Key Benefits of Predictive Maintenance

Predictive maintenance offers several clear advantages:

  • Data-Driven Decisions: Uses real-time performance data to guide maintenance activities.
  • Resource Optimization: Allows for planned interventions during regular operations, minimizing disruptions.
  • Strategic Planning: Improves budget and resource allocation by anticipating future needs.

These benefits not only improve performance but also significantly reduce costs, making predictive maintenance a game-changer for modern infrastructure management.

Next Steps for Better Asset Management

Main Benefits

Oxand’s predictive lifecycle management helps organizations lower costs, minimize downtime, and make better use of resources for aging infrastructure. Here’s what companies have achieved using this approach:

  • Lower Costs: Maintenance expenses drop by 10-15%, thanks to risk-based strategies that maintain asset performance [18].
  • Fewer Breakdowns: Equipment failures decrease by 70-75%, while downtime is cut by 35-45% [18].
  • Smarter Resource Use: Predictive planning allows organizations to cut MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Operations) inventory spending by up to 10% [19].

One example is Mueller Industries, which overhauled its maintenance process using handheld contact microphone sensors linked to a cloud-based system. By leveraging machine learning, they detected critical issues like rapid bearing wear on high-speed equipment, enabling timely repairs with minimal disruption [19].

These outcomes highlight the effectiveness of a structured approach, such as Oxand Simeo™.

Start Using Oxand Today

Oxand Simeo™ offers data-driven tools to help you tackle the challenges of aging infrastructure. To make the most of it, follow these steps:

1. Initial Assessment

Start by documenting your current maintenance costs, downtime, and compliance data. This baseline will help you measure ROI as you implement changes.

2. Strategic Planning

Create an asset strategy that uses predictive analytics to plan maintenance, allocate budgets to critical assets, and track performance and compliance.

3. Implementation Framework

Phase Action Items Expected Outcomes Setup Document asset inventory and risk framework Clear understanding of assets Integration Install monitoring systems and train staff Real-time tracking Optimization Apply predictive maintenance schedules Lower maintenance costs Evaluation Monitor KPIs and refine strategies Better asset performance

Most organizations see results within 6-12 months, with ROI potentially reaching up to ten times the initial investment [19].

Related posts

> Return to news